Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 3242 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 285 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65453 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |