Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1713 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6100 - 202 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
