Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-860 is 764 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6100 - 115 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
