Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 964 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-6100 - 130 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 88 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 88 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |