Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 565 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6100 - 223 vs 222 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
