Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1595 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-4350 - 219 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
