Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2364 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than FX-4350 - 189 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
