Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1799 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than FX-4350 - 57 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |