Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2401 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-4350 - 236 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 64 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
