Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 4126 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 74% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 75 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 22 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 22 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
