Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2244 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Ready or Not than FX-4130 - 274 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €16.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |