Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2803 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4130 - 192 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |