Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2878 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than FX-4130 - 730 vs 671 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
730
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1099.9
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,099.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |