Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2228 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-4130 - 171 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Zambezi | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
