Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4110 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €22.88 vs €717.24
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 193% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-4100 - 205 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76726 minutes ago
Buy for €717.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |