Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - €22.88 vs €107.37
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-4670K - €0.21 vs €0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than FX-4100 - 120 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Intel Core I5-4670K 3,4GHz LGA1150 6MB Cache Haswell Boxed CPU No Cooler
Buy for €107.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
