Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470T outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470T is 233 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-3470T - €22.88 vs €246.72
- Up to 90% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-3470T - €0.15 vs €1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than FX-4100 - 159 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
152
95.59748427672956%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
9.67741935483871%
Price, €
€246.72
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |