Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 3205 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - €22.88 vs €145.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - €0.17 vs €0.78 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 36% better in Dirt 5 than FX-4100 - 188 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
138
73.40425531914893%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
21.794871794871796%
Price, €
€145.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €145.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |