Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3117 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €22.88 vs €89.94
- Up to 72% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 3 3100 - €0.05 vs €0.18 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-4100 - 491 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Processore (4C/8T, 18 MB Cache, 3.9 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
