Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 2529 days newer than Pentium G2120.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G2120 - 169 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 55 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Pentium G2120 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
| Rome | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
