Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms EPYC 7702 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7702.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7702
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7702 - 225 vs 196 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7702 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€483.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €483.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7702 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
200 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |