Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 660 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than EPYC 75F3 - 148 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 120 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€497.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €497.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |