Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1589 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield IV than EPYC 7551 - 474 vs 393 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€434.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €434.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |