Buy on Amazon
€208.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than EPYC 7551 - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3,9 GHz/4,9 GHz, 12 MB di cache)
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Naples | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
