Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 1497 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than EPYC 7302P - 751 vs 745 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-6500 3.20 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 6 MB Cache 65 W CPU Processore LGA 1151
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-6500
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
