Buy on Amazon
€41.27
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 3132 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2400S - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
111
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.27
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Sockel 1155 Core-i5 Processore (2500MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €41.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
