Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 99% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7302P - 280 vs 141 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€248
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €248 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |