Buy on Amazon
€138.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 267 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than EPYC 7302P - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 6 core fino a 4,3 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €138.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
