Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 946 days newer than Pentium G4560.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than Pentium G4560 - 231 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 54 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
213
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |