Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 355 days older than Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10850K - 226 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
223
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€342.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |