Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i7-980X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 3431 days newer than Core i7-980X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-980X - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-980X - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-980X - 32 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-980X
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-980X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Gulftown |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
