Buy on Amazon
€35
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1924 days newer than Core i5-4590.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4590 - 104 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 84 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-4590 3.30 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 6 MB Cache 84 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
