Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 848 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 104 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
102
98%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €231.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |