Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1042 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €83.52 vs €553.97
- Up to 82% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-13900K - €0.18 vs €0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 19% better in DOOM Eternal than Athlon 3000G - 558 vs 470 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
470
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €83.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4362 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
558
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
18%
Price, €
€553.97
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €553.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |