Key Differences
In short — CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR outperforms Velztorm White Ferrux CTO on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC
- Performs up to 19% better in Valorant than Velztorm White Ferrux CTO - 502 vs 422 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
FPS
502
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
34%
GPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2206
100%
Multi-Core
11922
100%
CPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
Core i7-10700K
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1724
78%
Multi-Core
8166
68%
Velztorm White Ferrux CTO Gaming Desktop PC | vs | CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Feb 25th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i7-10700K |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
