Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Tiburcc outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Up to 2% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1349.0 vs €1379.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - €8.65 vs €8.84 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2675 minutes ago
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
93.10344827586208%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
89.49849978568368%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
null-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
null-core
Single-Core
2178
79.6343692870201%
Multi-Core
10263
83.71808467248552%
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
