Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Tiburcc on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 24% better in FIFA 23 than Tiburcc - 262 vs 211 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 1136 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
262
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2459
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1137 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
68%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |