Key Differences
In short — Tiburcc outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Performs up to 84% better in Dirt 5 than EMCA4 - 199 vs 108 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Tiburcc - €859.00 vs €1629.00
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Tiburcc - €7.95 vs €8.19 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2910 minutes ago
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2913 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
8th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
