Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Tiburcc outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Gamer Business on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Performs up to 197% better in Dead Space than Ankermann Gamer Business - 113 vs 38 FPS
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dead Space than Ankermann Gamer Business - €13.5 vs €33.39 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Gamer Business PC
- Up to 17% cheaper than Tiburcc - €1269.0 vs €1525.0
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1525
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
FPS
38
33.6283185840708%
Value, €/FPS
€33.39/FPS
40.43126684636118%
Price, €
€1269
100%
Buy for €1,269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
26.90909090909091%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
16.818181818181817%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | Ankermann Gamer Business PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i7-10700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
