Key Differences
In short — Tiburcc outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Performs up to 77% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EMCA4 - 101 vs 57 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
48%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
