Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Tiburcc on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 230% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Tiburcc - 132 vs 40 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€18.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2459
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
3rd Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
51%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Tiburcc Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
