Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms SYSTEMTREFF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than SYSTEMTREFF - 148 vs 138 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
50th Variation
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
40th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
40th Variation
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
99%
GPU Winner
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
40th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600X
4.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2890
100%
Multi-Core
12927
81%
CPU Winner
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2685
93%
Multi-Core
15870
100%
SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
