Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms SYSTEMTREFF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 39% better in No Man's Sky than SYSTEMTREFF - 168 vs 121 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
41st Variation
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
143rd Variation
41st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
143rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
41%
GPU Winner
41st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
143rd Variation
Ryzen 9 5950X
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2213
100%
Multi-Core
12097
100%
CPU Winner
SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5950X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
