Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper STGSivir on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing STGSivir is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of STGSivir PC
- Up to 62% cheaper than EMCA4 - €924.99 vs €2459.00
- Up to 21% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than EMCA4 - €4.70 vs €5.95 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 110% better in Overwatch 2 than STGSivir - 413 vs 197 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €924.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 468 minutes ago
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 467 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
5th Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
31%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
STGSivir PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
