Key Differences
In short — STGAubron outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 95 vs 88 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 480 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Core i7-8700
3.2 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1537
75%
Multi-Core
5982
69%
7th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2052
100%
Multi-Core
8610
100%
CPU Winner
STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-8700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
