Key Differences
In short — Sedatech outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Performs up to 86% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 201 vs 108 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 69% cheaper than Sedatech - €959.00 vs €3119.90
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Sedatech - €8.88 vs €15.52 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €3,119.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 724 minutes ago
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
42%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Sedatech PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
