Key Differences
In short — Predator Acer Orion 3000 PO3-630 outperforms Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value. The better performing Predator Acer Orion 3000 PO3-630 is 602 days older than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4.
Advantages of Predator Acer Orion 3000 PO3-630 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 - 59 vs 52 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 21st, 2022 • 1st Variation
FPS
59
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 21st, 2022 • 1st Variation
Nov 13th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 21st, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
Nov 13th, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 21st, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-11400F
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1961
86%
Multi-Core
7608
71%
Nov 13th, 2023
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2290
100%
Multi-Core
10745
100%
CPU Winner
Predator Acer Orion 3000 PO3-630 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Mar 21st, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2023 |
Core i5-11400F | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |