Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Tiburcc outperforms the more expensive PC fisso on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Performs up to 81% better in Counter-Strike 2 than PC fisso - 456 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than PC fisso - €1329.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than PC fisso - €2.91 vs €5.95 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
FPS
252
55.26315789473685%
Value, €/FPS
€5.95/FPS
48.90756302521008%
Price, €
€1499
88%
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
456
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1329
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
28.71717171717172%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
25.649350649350648%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-11900
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2130
77.62390670553935%
Multi-Core
8816
69.94604887337353%
6th Variation
Ryzen 5 7500F
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2744
100%
Multi-Core
12604
100%
CPU Winner
PC fisso Computer PC | vs | Tiburcc Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 7500F |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
