Key Differences
In short — MXZ outperforms CSL on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of MXZ Desktop PC
- Performs up to 880% better in Starfield than CSL - 49 vs 5 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
MXZ Desktop PC
2nd Variation
CSL Gaming PC
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
MXZ Desktop PC
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 7700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CSL Gaming PC
7th Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
33%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
MXZ Desktop PC
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
MXZ Desktop PC | vs | CSL Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | GPU | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
