Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 90 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Memory - €829.00 vs €929.00
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €9.21 vs €10.80 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1027 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1031 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
64th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
64th Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
70%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
